<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://www.romhack.net/index.php?feed/rss2/xslt" ?><rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>Romhack.Net, the alternative IT magazine</title>
  <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?</link>
  <atom:link href="http://www.romhack.net/index.php?feed/rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:45:04 +0100</pubDate>
  <copyright></copyright>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Dotclear</generator>
  
    
  <item>
    <title>How to search Objects in SQL Server 2005/2008</title>
    <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/10/09/How-to-search-Objects-in-SQL-Server-2005/2008</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:d832ded4910e34007d4a93586b48b7d7</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:33:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
        <category>Development</category>
        <category>Microsoft</category><category>SQL Server</category><category>Visual Studio</category>    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/public/WindowsLiveWriter/HowtosearchObjectsinSQLServer20052008_AE52/SQLServer2008Logo_4.png&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;border-width: 0; margin: 0 5px 0 0;&quot; title=&quot;SQLServer2008Logo&quot; alt=&quot;SQLServer2008Logo&quot; src=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/public/WindowsLiveWriter/HowtosearchObjectsinSQLServer20052008_AE52/SQLServer2008Logo_thumb_1.png&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;108&quot; width=&quot;160&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
Software evolves… new versions of major software are released once
every few years, they contains improvements, bug fixes, but sometimes,
some features disappear just like they appeared… without any seemingly
valid reason…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So is the case, with the useful “Object search”
feature, which was present in SQL Server 2000 Query Analyzer but
somehow didn’t make its way into SQL Server 2005 and 2008’s Management
Studio.&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;In the past, SQL Server came with two main GUI tools:
SQL Server Enterprise Manager for administration-oriented tasks, and
SQL Server Query Analyzer for running queries, creating stored
procedures, and other development-oriented tasks. This design was not
the most efficient because both DBAs and database developers often
found themselves... &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/10/09/How-to-search-Objects-in-SQL-Server-2005/2008&quot;&gt;Read&lt;/em&gt; How to search Objects in SQL Server 2005/2008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
  <item>
    <title>Autoruns: a tricky option to be wary of...</title>
    <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/05/11/Autoruns%3A-a-tricky-option-to-be-wary-of</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:95d724d51a2c2e2d36679ab90913a32e</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:55:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
        <category>Software</category>
        <category>autoruns</category><category>registry</category><category>russinovich</category><category>virus</category>    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;This week, I had the occasion to work on a computer who had been infected by several malwares. Removing the malwares wasn’t much of a problem using my customized BartPE-based BootCD but the nasties left all sort of tracks behind them that I had to wipe clean. One of the consequences of these infections was that several administration tools wouldn’t run, most noticeably Regedit. Several viruses try to make the job as hard as they can for the computer user to get rid of the malwares and one of the best way to prevent this is to disable several tools that are usually very helpful in the process…&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;Personally, I don’t think it is very wise to rely entirely on online
malware elimination (ie. deleting them while running on the infected
OS): you can not be entirely sure the system is clean afterwards,
especially since rootkits have become so popular since the last years.
The best ways is to boot from a clean media and remove the infections... &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/05/11/Autoruns%3A-a-tricky-option-to-be-wary-of&quot;&gt;Read&lt;/em&gt; Autoruns: a tricky option to be wary of...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
  <item>
    <title>A new kind of search</title>
    <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/05/21/A-new-kind-of-search</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:9629e30d5c663aa2e68203784bb848d4</guid>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:31:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
        <category>Internet</category>
        <category>Cuil</category><category>Google</category><category>PowerSet</category><category>search</category><category>semantic</category><category>WolframAlpha</category>    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;About one year ago was released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cuil.com/&quot;&gt;Cuil&lt;/a&gt;, the self-proclaimed Google-killer. Although Cuil's search quality has significantly improved since the grand (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2008/07/29/Did-the-Google-killer-kill-itself&quot;&gt;failed&lt;/a&gt;) opening, the site could only grab a negligible share of the overall search market and does not currently propose a compelling enough service to grab more. People are still waiting for the real Google-killer to come... So this is no surprise to have a huge buzz around &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wolframalpha.com/&quot;&gt;WolframAlpha&lt;/a&gt;, the new &quot;search engine&quot; sponsored by Stephen Wolfram, the world-class scientist behind Mathematica. But…&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;…let's put it this way: comparing Google and WolframAlpha is like comparing apples and oranges. Because contrary to what we could read on some newspapers these days, WolframAlpha is not a web search engine. It's a knowledge engine, which means that where Google will return (indexed) content, WolframAlpha will return facts. Let's take an example... &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/05/21/A-new-kind-of-search&quot;&gt;Read&lt;/em&gt; A new kind of search&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
  <item>
    <title>The second browsers war</title>
    <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/04/10/The-second-browsers-war</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:bb7df2d9ec80522f8b434a53975ed550</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:19:00 +0200</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
        <category>Software</category>
        <category>Browser</category><category>Chrome</category><category>Firefox</category><category>Google</category><category>Internet Explorer</category>    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/04/10/../public/WindowsLiveWriter_ThefutureofFirefoxinthewebbrowserswars_1117D_FFChrome_2.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;border-width: 0; margin: 0 5px 0 0;&quot; title=&quot;FFChrome&quot; alt=&quot;FFChrome&quot; src=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/04/10/../public/WindowsLiveWriter_ThefutureofFirefoxinthewebbrowserswars_1117D_FFChrome_thumb.jpg&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;118&quot; width=&quot;150&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Some days ago, a BetaNews article caught my attention with its sensational title “&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betanews.com/article/Can-Mozilla-escape-a-premature-endgame-for-Firefox/1237590444&quot;&gt;Can Mozilla escape a premature endgame for Firefox&lt;/a&gt;?”,
which hypothesizes that the popular web browser can’t last long,
especially since Google’s arrival on the market with Chrome. It is true
that the browser’s market has been rather busy in the last months,
especially in the Windows area with the arrival of two challengers,
Google Chrome and Apple Safari, in an area which was thought to be
locked down by both Microsoft with IE, and Mozilla with Firefox. It is
funny to remember that roughly 10 years ago, the first browser war was
raging between Microsoft and Netscape for the domination of the Windows
browsers market and the winner remained unchallenged for a bit less
than a decade. Let’s see how things are changing with the appearance of
outsiders and what it means for each of the warriors in the arena.&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;Case #1 : Firefox vs IE
Firefox is a browser that has gained an incredible popularity in the last years and managed to convert an impressive number of Internet Explorer users. According to the latest figures available, Firefox’s market share is currently of 22% world-wide and not less than 35% in Europe. Few people would have thought it would get... &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/04/10/The-second-browsers-war&quot;&gt;Read&lt;/em&gt; The second browsers war&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
  <item>
    <title>More anti-virus fail...</title>
    <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/03/09/More-anti-virus-failhellip2</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:877fd53d99e08befbc36d0ba161075e3</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:32:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
        <category>Software</category>
        <category>security</category><category>virus</category>    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;If you are a regular follower of this blog, you’ll probably remember my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/03/09/../index.php?post/2008/12/18/Are-anti-viruses-still-really-up-to-their-job&quot;&gt;couple&lt;/a&gt; of rather &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/03/09/../index.php?post/2009/01/05/Are-anti-viruses-still-really-up-to-their-job-Part-2-of-2&quot;&gt;recent entries&lt;/a&gt;
regarding the current state of the anti-virus technology and whether
this kind of products still are as useful as they were in the past in
today’s world. I’ve been going into great lengths regarding their weak
points and how they tend to lagging behind the Operating Systems more
and more every year due to their missing of infections, delays in
signatures updates, which makes their protection far from being
bullet-proof. What’s worst than everything, though, is when a system
isn’t infected but the anti-virus thinks it is… and has identified an
important system file as an offender…&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;This morning, I received several e-mails notifications from our anti-virus system (Eset’s NOD32) indicating a virus intrusion in several of our servers, namely by the Win32/Kryptik.JX trojan in the file msdtc.exe (I won’t translate what the dtc acronym means in french, but it could have been an appropriate name, had I not known that it actually... &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/03/09/More-anti-virus-failhellip2&quot;&gt;Read&lt;/em&gt; More anti-virus fail...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
  <item>
    <title>FileZilla insecurities</title>
    <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/03/02/FileZilla-insecurities</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:aa196a9730e1390f5905eefd00dcb2a3</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:07:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
        <category>Software</category>
        <category>FTP</category><category>Open-Source</category><category>Security</category>    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/03/02/../public/WindowsLiveWriter_FileZillainsecurities_B9A5_25935_filezilla_2.png&quot;&gt;&lt;img title=&quot;FileZilla&quot; style=&quot;border: 0 none ; margin: 0 5px 0 0;&quot; alt=&quot;FileZilla&quot; src=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/03/02/../public/WindowsLiveWriter_FileZillainsecurities_B9A5_25935_filezilla_thumb.png&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;124&quot; width=&quot;124&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I have been using &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smartftp.com/&quot;&gt;SmartFTP&lt;/a&gt;
so far for my FTP needs but my current hosting company is having some
compatibility problems with it (or rather, it is the other way around
since all the clients are fine with this server). SmartFTP is one of
the best FTP clients feature-wise but unfortunately has a lot of little
annoying bugs and I decided to check out for more stable, and possibly
free alternatives. Of course, Google was my friend and &lt;a href=&quot;http://filezilla-project.org/&quot;&gt;FileZilla&lt;/a&gt;
turned out to be one of the most popular results. I obviously had heard
of this software before and often under a good light, but I decided to
review it a bit more, especially regarding the security… and for an
open-source application, the mentality of the developers towards this
important matter in our increasingly connected world doesn’t fail to
surprise…&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;It turns out that FileZilla already had some problems with its storing of the passwords in its Site Manager, a feature allowing the user to memorize his favorite servers into the software’s configuration and log into them with a single click rather than reentering the password manually. It is obviously a given that storing passwords is (most of the... &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/03/02/FileZilla-insecurities&quot;&gt;Read&lt;/em&gt; FileZilla insecurities&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
  <item>
    <title>Application skinning and user-interface consistency</title>
    <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/02/07/Application-skinning-and-user-interface-consistency</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:451718779e651f793b8013a782cf028a</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:25:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
        <category>Software</category>
        <category>skinning</category><category>UI</category>    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;To be remarked and distinguished, one's products must be clearly
different from the others: it is a fact of marketing. When applied to
software, there are two main kind of differentiation possible: the
invisible to the eyes, yet noticeable, differences, such as better
internal engineering and better performance, and the visible ones, most
particularly the user-interface. In operating systems supporting
windowing systems, the user-interface is one of the most important
aspects of the product because it is the interface between the user and
the machine: this interface thus needs to be both pleasing to the eyes
but still ergonomic and efficient for the user to be able to accomplish
his duties as quickly as possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having one’s application stand out
from the others is maybe a good thing for marketing, but what happens
when every application on the system wants to look different from the
other in term of user-interface of the system taken as a whole? This is
what we are going to see through this argumented rant, with the help of
some applications examples, and try to see whether the short-term
benefits of these moves are worth the longer-term inconveniences of
inappropriate user-interface skinning.&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;First case: “I want to look like the very newest thing available, even though it doesn’t suit your system”
Here is one of the application I have on my system “PDF Password Cracker Pro” which is able to recover/remove the password protection of some PDF files. The purpose of this application here is irrelevant, so let’s only look at its user... &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/02/07/Application-skinning-and-user-interface-consistency&quot;&gt;Read&lt;/em&gt; Application skinning and user-interface consistency&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
  <item>
    <title>Are anti-viruses still really up to their job (Part 2 of 2)</title>
    <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/01/05/Are-anti-viruses-still-really-up-to-their-job-Part-2-of-2</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:b9e3a7a75fc1cb59fa6bd6e8c9ccb1d0</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
        <category>Software</category>
        <category>malware</category><category>SDL</category><category>UAC</category><category>virus</category><category>Windows</category>    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/01/05/../public/WindowsLiveWriter_AreantivirusesstillreallyuptotheirjobPar_AF90_vistasecurity_2.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img title=&quot;vistasecurity&quot; style=&quot;border: 0 none ; margin: 0 5px 0 0;&quot; alt=&quot;vistasecurity&quot; src=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/01/05/../public/WindowsLiveWriter_AreantivirusesstillreallyuptotheirjobPar_AF90_vistasecurity_thumb.jpg&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;125&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; As we have seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/01/05/../index.php?post/2008/12/18/Are-anti-viruses-still-really-up-to-their-job&quot;&gt;earlier&lt;/a&gt;,
the anti-virus current detection schemes are not bulletproof and tend
to let threats get through for a number of days and sometimes weeks.
From this bleak situation, we can legitimately ask ourselves whether
anti-viruses still are the right answer to nowadays threats and if a
more drastic approach is not to be envisaged, and if the
security-mechanisms implemented in the modern Operating Systems do not
make anti-virus products redundant, or even excess their performance.
Ironically, anti-virus products were created to protect the weak
Operating Systems and acted as its sole immunity system for a long
time, but with the Operating Systems maturing and outgrowing their
original weaknesses, what is the future of anti-virus products,
especially in the corporate world?&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;I distinctly remember, and I don’t doubt you do too, this story about Jim Allchin declaring to the Press that Windows Vista was secure enough for it to be used without an anti-virus installed. While this comment was seen by some as an arguably small communication mistake, judging by how the Press and forum users commented on this declaration, it... &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2009/01/05/Are-anti-viruses-still-really-up-to-their-job-Part-2-of-2&quot;&gt;Read&lt;/em&gt; Are anti-viruses still really up to their job (Part 2 of 2)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
  <item>
    <title>Are anti-viruses still really up to their job (Part 1 of 2)</title>
    <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2008/12/18/Are-anti-viruses-still-really-up-to-their-job</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:ca997629712900d3e760836ce8de7423</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
        <category>Software</category>
            
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2008/12/18/../public/WindowsLiveWriter_Areantivirusstillreallyneeded_E23F_ilust-malware_4.png&quot;&gt;&lt;img title=&quot;ilust-malware&quot; style=&quot;border: 0 none ; margin: 0 5px 0 0;&quot; alt=&quot;Are anti-viruses still really up to their job (Part 1 of 2)&quot; src=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2008/12/18/../public/WindowsLiveWriter_Areantivirusstillreallyneeded_E23F_ilust-malware_thumb_1.png&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; width=&quot;170&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
Anti-viruses, as everyone knows, are software that prevent intrusion of
malware into the system where it is installed and active. But what
happens when anti-viruses become less efficient in this mission than
the the very Operating System that they are supposed to protect? In
this article, I will try to establish whether anti-virus as they
currently stand are a trustable protection to the current threats, and, in the next installment of this two-parts series,
what’s their future, in a IT world where the focus on security has
never been so high, especially in the Operating Systems area.&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;At the beginning of the month, a colleague I get along particularly well with brought me his
home machine to ask me to take a look because it was infected by a
virus. It turns out that the same colleague asked me for advice some
months ago when he wanted to buy an anti-virus and I advised him to get
Eset NOD32, which is
the product I chose to... &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2008/12/18/Are-anti-viruses-still-really-up-to-their-job&quot;&gt;Read&lt;/em&gt; Are anti-viruses still really up to their job (Part 1 of 2)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
  <item>
    <title>The UI ribbon, more than just evolution</title>
    <link>http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2008/12/13/The-UI-ribbon-more-than-just-evolution</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:885b56a366d9b86c5069f8bf27a16cd8</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:35:00 +0100</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
        <category>Software</category>
        <category>Microsoft</category><category>Office</category><category>ribbon</category><category>UI</category><category>Vista</category>    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;The latest fashion in terms of user interface is the Office ribbon, this thick horizontal bar containing various visual icons grouped by general task. After getting through most of the applications of the well-known suite, the ribbon will also invade most of the Windows accessories soon…&lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p&gt;This move is not a surprise, as the mastermind of the Office 2007 UI, Steve Sinofsky, replaced Kevin Johnson at the head of the Windows division a few months ago. But this will not prevent the controversy, after months of complaints from disappointed users of Office 2007, who were “forced” to use the ribbon and were not able to change back to the... &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.romhack.net/index.php?post/2008/12/13/The-UI-ribbon-more-than-just-evolution&quot;&gt;Read&lt;/em&gt; The UI ribbon, more than just evolution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    
    
    
      </item>
    
</channel>
</rss>
